We all have those times when we just can’t concentrate.

For some people, such as those with attention deficit disorder (ADD) or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), this is a lifelong struggle. For others, it is a passing condition that resolves itself in a short matter of time.

Editors who have deadlines to meet, like me, often feel that they are in big trouble when they cannot concentrate. It is true that we editors can get in over our heads when we fail to pay attention to our work. So what can you, as an editor, do when you just cannot focus?

1. Be aware of your surroundings. If you are at work, or at your desk in your home office, remember where you are and why you are there. Say to yourself, “My desk is not a place for daydreaming.” In that way, when your mind starts to wander, you can snap out of your reverie quickly.

• Listen to your body. If you have the urge to use the bathroom, your body will distract you until you do, so turn off your timer (if charging by the hour) and “go.” In the same way, if your back or rear end starts to hurt, you have probably been sitting too long in that desk chair, so turn off your timer and walk around. Stretch. Your body will thank you for it.

• Give in—but only temporarily. If you are in love, this strategy applies especially to you. If you just can’t get somebody out of your mind, you may need to turn off your timer, go into another room, sit down, and think about your special someone for five minutes. (NOTE: This is only acceptable if you work at home. If you work in an actual office, see #1 above.)

What do you do when you have trouble concentrating on your work?

To the left of my work desk is a utility shelf, on which rest several boxes and storage containers (we had to downsize when we moved into our current home, and we were not very good at it).

Taped to said utility shelf is an 8 1/2-by-11-inch copy of my all-time favorite poster, which is “believed to be” in the public domain according to the US government website on which I found it.

The poster, which appears to have been created by a very artistically gifted child, depicts a large orange fish (with green eyelids) smoking a cigarette, through which is a fish hook. Very faint puffs of smoke can be seen above the cigarette. The fish looks extremely morose, as if it is thinking, “Why me? Why am I so addicted?” The big yellow letters in the upper right-hand corner read, “DON’T YOU GET HOOKED!”

Hooked. Get it?

I first saw this poster in the nurse’s office in junior high school. I thought it was so beautiful—very artsy. By the time I went back to class, I was in love with it. The poster was also in the nurse’s office in my high school (I guess the county schools had bought them in bulk). Years later, I had a friendly acquaintance who had seen the same poster in a Baltimore County school. She, too, thought it was beautiful.

So, why I am going on about a poster with a fish smoking a cigarette?

The copy next to my desk inspires me. I just love having it there. I named the fish Fred, and sometimes, between tasks, I talk to him. “Life is hard,” I will say. “Isn’t it, Fred?”

Or maybe, “AI is so scary, Fred. Don’t you think so?”

I am well aware that Fred cannot move, let alone answer me. But I still find it therapeutic to breathe a single sentence to him once in a while. Some people talk to their pets; I, not having any pets, talk to my poster copy.

How do you cope with stress while you are working?

We need to stop putting down people who work slowly (or more slowly than we do).

I am not talking about people who are lazy and work slowly even though they could work faster. These folks are another whole animal. I am talking about people who work slowly because they are meticulous or because they have a disability of some kind.

Some people have invisible disabilities that cause them to work slowly, and these people are often the victims of bullying in the workplace (and other places) because others cannot see the disabilities that slow them down.

Even fast-food jobs are not ideal for these people, for these jobs are just that: FAST.

One such workplace where people who work slowly are often discriminated against is the scientific laboratory. In the industry, a lab worker is expected to work quickly and correctly; in other words, the employee is expected to work efficiently. A meticulous lab worker may be fired from an industrial lab if they cannot fulfill a quota of, for example, X cell transfections completed in one day. Never mind that this worker has never contaminated a vial in their career or if every single transfection they have completed has yielded wonderful results. “We are not paying you to take your time.”

Even in academic labs, pressure is often put on meticulous workers to “speed it up,” because “we only have a year and a half left on our grant. You want a job in a year and a half, don’t you?”

Such bullying and taunting is, simply put, ableist behavior.  And sadly, it is not limited to science. If you have ever scoured the job search engines while looking for employment, you have probably noticed that seemingly 80 to 90 percent of jobs advertised require candidates to “be able to thrive in a fast-paced environment.” This is not good news for the meticulous or disabled person who works slowly.

Do you know anyone who works rather slowly but regularly produces quality work? Are you that person?

I am in the process of learning a new skill: Adobe Acrobat.

I’ve used Acrobat Reader for years and I know well how to save a Word document as a PDF, but during the last year or so, I have used Acrobat in my editing and I am continuing to learn how to use it to do more tasks.

When I edited PDFs for my friend’s company a year ago, I learned how to place comments in “sticky notes” right at the site of an issue. Doing this is as simple as clicking the picture of the sticky note, clicking where on the PDF I want the comment to go, and then typing “Please place a period at the end of this sentence,” or “Please add ‘stop’ before ‘here,’” or whatever is needed. When the comments are all lined up on the right side of the screen with their page numbers indicated, I like that. When they are scattered over the page, not so much.

What I discovered earlier this year, thanks to the wonderful webinar given by Ronane Lloyd, is that there are lots of other things that Acrobat can do. For example, I can highlight text using different colors. I can mark where I want to insert text, and then insert text within a bubble that corresponds to that mark. I can delete, underline, and strikethrough text.

I can also draw on the PDF, although I have yet to figure out why I would need to do this (I’m sure there are reasons). I can draw a line, an arrow, a polygon, or a cloud, to name a few. On the “dummy” PDFs on which I have been practicing, I have been having quite a bit of fun with the drawing tools.

The “pointer” tool, as I call it, is the most important. I must click on it when I finish using a selected tool in order to stop using that tool.

Just about every industry needs someone who can edit PDFs, and I am making myself even more marketable by learning this. Just a little more practice and I will feel confident enough to list the skill on my resume.

What new skills are you learning at the moment?

“How,” you may ask, “did a biochemist like you become an editor?”

There were several “springboards” that catapulted me into my current life as an editor.

The first one was back in high school. My senior year, I was on the staff of the school newspaper, where the faculty advisor had assigned me the role of copyeditor. Back then, I did not know what a style manual even was. However, I was excellent at spelling, punctuation, and catching typos even back then, and the advisor called me “one of the best we’ve ever had.”

It turned out that I chose to study the biological sciences rather than journalism, and my forte in writing and editing did not surface again until I  was in graduate school and wrote my master’s thesis. I wrote it so well that my advisor said that I should go into scientific writing instead of lab work. Alas, I did not listen to her, and after eight years of steadily working in labs, I found myself unemployed, thanks to an unbelievably ableist system.

To add skills to my resume, I began volunteering in the office of my church, and somehow after some time, it became known that I was extremely good at catching typos, misspellings, and such. So I was given the weekly programs to edit. Not only was I good at this, but I enjoyed it very much. Seeing how well I edited the programs, the staff began giving me other materials to edit—Bible study booklets, the staff handbook, a guide for children’s area volunteers. They continually told me how wonderful I was at editing. My highlight there was writing a letter to the state authorities so that the church’s bookkeeper could get a concealed carry permit to protect her when she took thousands of dollars with her to the bank.

In 2018, I took all these things into consideration and decided to be an independent editor. This is when I did research and found out about the Editorial Freelancers Association (EFA), which gave me a ton of valuable information on starting an editing business. After a few months, I learned of the American Copy Editors Society (ACES), which was for folks who did exactly what I did. I joined both organizations and met really great people. And the rest, as they say, is history.

Fellow editors, what was your springboard into doing what you do?

I have said it before and I will say it again: Running an editing business is “feast or famine,” to use a tired cliché.

This summer has been one prolonged famine.

I have gotten a few small assignments here and there, so thankfully, there have not been any months where my earnings have been zero. But there have not been any large assignments since May.

So what have I been doing with myself during this dry spell? More than one would think.

First and foremost, I have been reaching out to potential new clients. I go on the websites of R1 universities in the US and find the contact info for the chair of their biochemistry (or similar) department. Then I send that person an email explaining my services and how my editing could increase the chances of their department’s papers being accepted for publication. I have contacted a great many department chairs in this way. Cold emails can be frightening, but they often are a necessity.

Another good use of my time this summer was my taking Kristine Thornley’s online, self-paced course in medical editing and AMA style, which was given through the EFA (one of my professional organizations). Sure, I had done some medical editing before, but during the course, I was so surprised at what I did not know. For example, an author must not use the term “baby”; they must use the term “infant” or “child” instead. Another thing of which I was unaware is that the apostrophe-s is not used in disease names; it’s Parkinson disease, not Parkinson’s disease. I learned a ton of information about tables and figures, as well. If you do medical editing or want to learn it, I highly recommend Ms. Thornley’s course. Students get 364 days to complete it, but I did it in four months.

Finally, I’ve been active on LinkedIn, posting original content and reposting others’ content and commenting. This is how I have been getting noticed (well, word of mouth has worked better for me, but a lot of people want to connect with me on LinkedIn).

Are you going through a “famine” right now? If so, how are you using the time to your advantage?

Believe it or not, that is the condition of my desk right now.

Not long ago, I decluttered my desk, removing piles of papers and either filing them, recycling them, or shredding them. I have only important items on my desk at the moment. What are these important items (other than my crucially important laptop)? you may ask.

First, there is my At-A-Glance DayMinder weekly planner. I absolutely love At-A-Glance, because the spaces for each day are large—the better for writing in more goals for the day. It’s spiral bound, so it will stay flat and open on my desk. And although it is large enough for my handwriting, it actually fits in my purse, so I can tote it to medical and dental appointments.

There’s also my little orange calculator. No, it’s not the printing kind, but those make me nervous, so I don’t like them anyway. My calculator is useful for estimating the cost of an editing project and figuring invoices.

I also have a black stress ball on my desk. The ball is good for getting my stress out through my hands when I am reading something that needs a lot of work. Next to it is the case containing my Forte ear buds. I never use the ear buds while I work, but I charge them during that time. There’s nothing worse than taking an evening walk while listening to music and having one’s ear buds run out of juice.

Finally, I have the Fiedler Editorial financial records on the left side of the desk and my Garfield mouse pad on the right side next to the laptop. If you have been reading this blog for a good while, you know that I adore all things Garfield.

My high school journalism teacher once had a sign on her desk that read, “A neat desk is a sign of a sick mind.” You can imagine what my teacher’s desk looked like.

What important items are on your desk, besides your computer?

In an academic research laboratory, staff members with disabilities are more common than one might think. I worked in several different research labs in the past while having mild cerebral palsy and a documented mental illness. Some of my supervisors were incredibly patient, kind, and understanding, although they expected no less than my best work (which they deserved). Others, however, simply did not know how to treat other human beings, much less those with disabilities.

Looking back on my eight years in scientific research labs, I have put together a list of dos and don’ts for lab supervisors regarding a staff member with disabilities.

Do try to get to know your staff member at least somewhat. Find out how they like to approach challenges and let them use those methods to solve problems with their work.

Don’t force your way of doing things on your staff member (unless it is crucial for the success of the experiment or for safety concerns). There may be more than one way of performing a method, and your staff member might feel that a way other than yours is easier, more comfortable, and even more effective.

Do be patient with a staff member who tries to work quickly but simply cannot. Avoid telling them to “hurry up” or asking them, “What’s taking so long?” This is ableist behavior on your part.

Don’t say, “Spit it out,” to a staff member who stutters or stammers while speaking to you. Chances are this is a reaction to being bullied by you.

Do take your staff member aside to a private place when you need to give them a “talking-to,” and do so in your indoor voice.

Don’t dress your staff member down loudly in front of their coworkers when they mess up. Nobody deserves this.

Dear reader, what other suggestions might you have for lab supervisors?

(WARNING: If you love Facebook and can’t live without it, please take your eyes from this post. I am about to explain why and how much I dislike it.)

I was active on Facebook for almost nine years between November 2008 and October 2017. During that time, I went from being fascinated with it to hating it. On October 5, 2017, I deleted my profile and account completely and have not returned to the platform since. I have never regretted this decision or attempted to come back. Please let me explain why.

1. It was a big time-waster. I often spent an hour or more scrolling and reading when I had more important things to do. At one point, I had to limit my Facebook time by saying, “You cannot be on Facebook from X hour to Y hour.” That limit was often difficult to stick to, because the platform was so addictive to me.
2. The content made me very stressed. People were posting all kinds of bad news on Facebook and articles about things to avoid and watch out for and be concerned and stressed about. And I bet that half of it was untrue.
3. The comments people made on other people’s posts were unbelievable sometimes. I had to ask, “Do you talk that way in real life?”
4. The ugly, hate-filled replies to a few of my own comments, written by people I didn’t know from Adam. Apparently, I “hate liberty and freedom” and “just want attention,” according to some folks who have never even met me and don’t know what I have been through.
5. The polarized political opinions that many people posted. Obviously, if you don’t have the guts to say it to someone’s face, write it on Facebook, right?
6. The ubiquitous memes, many of which were just plain awful.

These days, I use LinkedIn as my social media of choice. It was meant to be professional in nature when it was created, but some see it as another Facebook. I also use YouTube quite a bit, although I rarely comment on videos because it seems I always regret doing so. I have never used Snapchat or TikTok, and that shows my age.

Which social media platforms do you love and/or dislike?

N.B. Next weekend, I will be away from the blog (and my home). I wish all my readers a happy and safe weekend, and I will return to the blog on August 11.