Decluttered and tidy

Believe it or not, that is the condition of my desk right now.

Not long ago, I decluttered my desk, removing piles of papers and either filing them, recycling them, or shredding them. I have only important items on my desk at the moment. What are these important items (other than my crucially important laptop)? you may ask.

First, there is my At-A-Glance DayMinder weekly planner. I absolutely love At-A-Glance, because the spaces for each day are large—the better for writing in more goals for the day. It’s spiral bound, so it will stay flat and open on my desk. And although it is large enough for my handwriting, it actually fits in my purse, so I can tote it to medical and dental appointments.

There’s also my little orange calculator. No, it’s not the printing kind, but those make me nervous, so I don’t like them anyway. My calculator is useful for estimating the cost of an editing project and figuring invoices.

I also have a black stress ball on my desk. The ball is good for getting my stress out through my hands when I am reading something that needs a lot of work. Next to it is the case containing my Forte ear buds. I never use the ear buds while I work, but I charge them during that time. There’s nothing worse than taking an evening walk while listening to music and having one’s ear buds run out of juice.

Finally, I have the Fiedler Editorial financial records on the left side of the desk and my Garfield mouse pad on the right side next to the laptop. If you have been reading this blog for a good while, you know that I adore all things Garfield.

My high school journalism teacher once had a sign on her desk that read, “A neat desk is a sign of a sick mind.” You can imagine what my teacher’s desk looked like.

What important items are on your desk, besides your computer?

Dos and don’ts for lab supervisors regarding staff with disabilities

In an academic research laboratory, staff members with disabilities are more common than one might think. I worked in several different research labs in the past while having mild cerebral palsy and a documented mental illness. Some of my supervisors were incredibly patient, kind, and understanding, although they expected no less than my best work (which they deserved). Others, however, simply did not know how to treat other human beings, much less those with disabilities.

Looking back on my eight years in scientific research labs, I have put together a list of dos and don’ts for lab supervisors regarding a staff member with disabilities.

Do try to get to know your staff member at least somewhat. Find out how they like to approach challenges and let them use those methods to solve problems with their work.

Don’t force your way of doing things on your staff member (unless it is crucial for the success of the experiment or for safety concerns). There may be more than one way of performing a method, and your staff member might feel that a way other than yours is easier, more comfortable, and even more effective.

Do be patient with a staff member who tries to work quickly but simply cannot. Avoid telling them to “hurry up” or asking them, “What’s taking so long?” This is ableist behavior on your part.

Don’t say, “Spit it out,” to a staff member who stutters or stammers while speaking to you. Chances are this is a reaction to being bullied by you.

Do take your staff member aside to a private place when you need to give them a “talking-to,” and do so in your indoor voice.

Don’t dress your staff member down loudly in front of their coworkers when they mess up. Nobody deserves this.

Dear reader, what other suggestions might you have for lab supervisors?

It’s not going to get better until we get serious about it.

I’m talking about mental health.

I was reading this short article on LinkedIn and the comments on it: https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/mental-health-pto-is-often-denied-6125844/

I have to share my feelings on it because the situation sickened me.

It seems that 30 percent of mental health claims for disability pay were denied last year, compared to 18 percent of all other disability claims, according to the article. What does this tell us?

It tells us that mental health is viewed as less important than physical health in the workplace—and in the world in general.

As a person with a documented mental illness who works productively and even owns and operates a business, I rely on effective mental health care. When I was working at a staff job (as opposed to being my own boss), I was often forced to schedule appointments with counselors and psychiatrists during the workday, because those professionals worked the same hours I did. I was very blessed that I did not need notes from the professionals in order to use sick leave. (I am aware that sick leave is not the same as PTO, but it is very similar and suffers from the same problems regarding mental health.)

Very occasionally, I had to take a mental health day just to keep myself alive, because I knew I could not function at work that day due to severe depression or mania. Again, I was incredibly blessed that this did not need documentation. This was about 20 years ago. I don’t know if I could do the same thing in today’s workplace.

A lot of employers have “Employee Assistance Programs.” For me, these have proved to be ineffective.

Employers, and society in general, these days claim to be more cognizant of the mental health of their workers. However, if they don’t start treating it the same as their physical health, nothing is going to get better.

Antisocial media

(WARNING: If you love Facebook and can’t live without it, please take your eyes from this post. I am about to explain why and how much I dislike it.)

I was active on Facebook for almost nine years between November 2008 and October 2017. During that time, I went from being fascinated with it to hating it. On October 5, 2017, I deleted my profile and account completely and have not returned to the platform since. I have never regretted this decision or attempted to come back. Please let me explain why.

  1. It was a big time-waster. I often spent an hour or more scrolling and reading when I had more important things to do. At one point, I had to limit my Facebook time by saying, “You cannot be on Facebook from X hour to Y hour.” That limit was often difficult to stick to, because the platform was so addictive to me.
  2. The content made me very stressed. People were posting all kinds of bad news on Facebook and articles about things to avoid and watch out for and be concerned and stressed about. And I bet that half of it was untrue.
  3. The comments people made on other people’s posts were unbelievable sometimes. I had to ask, “Do you talk that way in real life?”
  4. The ugly, hate-filled replies to a few of my own comments, written by people I didn’t know from Adam. Apparently, I “hate liberty and freedom” and “just want attention,” according to some folks who have never even met me and don’t know what I have been through.
  5. The polarized political opinions that many people posted. Obviously, if you don’t have the guts to say it to someone’s face, write it on Facebook, right?
  6. The ubiquitous memes, many of which were just plain awful.

These days, I use LinkedIn as my social media of choice. It was meant to be professional in nature when it was created, but some see it as another Facebook. I also use YouTube quite a bit, although I rarely comment on videos because it seems I always regret doing so. I have never used Snapchat or TikTok, and that shows my age.

Which social media platforms do you love and/or dislike?

N.B. Next weekend, I will be away from the blog (and my home). I wish all my readers a happy and safe weekend, and I will return to the blog on August 11.

Things never to say to an unemployed person

Let me start off this week’s post by saying that if you are unemployed right now…I’m sorry.

I feel your pain. I was long-term unemployed myself in the past and those days were very dark. The grueling job applications…the frightening interviews…the rejection emails…I’ve been there. Please remember that you are not worthless or a loser.

If you have a friend or family member who is unemployed, it is tempting to say certain things to try to encourage them (“try” being the operative word). I would like to ask you to please refrain from telling them the following:

“How’s the job search going?” (Painfully, I am sure. And they probably don’t want to talk about it.)

“How did that interview go?” (If they really want you to know, they will tell you.)

“Have you heard from that job yet?” (If they had, they would have told you by now.)

“You should try looking on [insert name of job search engine here].” (Chances are that they already have looked.)

“When one door closes, another opens.” (This is the oldest cliché in the book.)

“Maybe God doesn’t want you to have a job right now. Maybe He wants you to be a missionary.” (Yes, someone actually said this to me once.)

“You should try applying at [insert name of low-paying entity here]. I hear they pay good money.” (Stop. Just stop.)

“Maybe people think you’re overqualified.” (It’s not like they can do anything about it.)

“Have you ever thought about going back to school?” (With whose money? Now more than ever, they need it to put food on their table.)

“You can’t buy a new pair of shoes. You don’t have a job.” (Yes, someone actually said this to me once as well. If you don’t have enough manners to not say this, you probably should not be a member of society.)

If you spent time unemployed, what atrocities did you hear?

Better days ahead? Better days ahead!

In one corner of the bulletin board that hangs on the wall above my work desk, I have an inspirational postcard which was sent to me a few years ago by a beloved childhood friend. It has a picture of a rainbow and reads “Better Days Ahead.”

Let’s just say that these days, I look at it a lot.

With the exception of the month of May, the time period from March up to and including the present day has seen business dry up for the most part. It’s not because my clients are ditching me—none of them have. It’s because they simply have not had work for me to do. Everyone who is in the independent editing business knows that work is either “feast or famine,” to use a tired cliché, and that the income is not steady.

It has not been often that I do my books at the end of the month and see that my expenses outweighed my earnings. But that is what happened in June.

However, I do believe what that postcard says—there are better days ahead.

The retail company for whom I edit is gearing up to begin creating its yearly catalogs, and in the fall and early winter, those keep me quite busy (and earn me quite a bit). The company will also be redesigning its website soon, and that will give me a lot of work to do next year, since there are many pages on the site.

The university for whom I edit scientific research manuscripts is getting ready to launch a public relations campaign to encourage more researchers to use its editing service.

Right now, I am researching biochemistry and biology departments at various R01 research universities and sending cold emails to department chairs, offering my editing services for their department’s manuscripts. This takes a lot of courage and thick skin. I have thus far received one response, consisting of eight words: “Please remove my name from your mailing list.”

Still, I carry on. Eventually one of them will show interest in my services.

Fellow freelance editors, what do you do to encourage yourself when you are down?

Rest in peace, USB

Does anyone out there still use USB (Universal Serial Bus) drives?

I don’t often use them, but I do if I am writing something like a blog post, which I don’t want cluttering up my cloud storage. Right now, I am saving this post on a USB drive, which contains all of my posts since May 5. Before that date, I was using another USB drive to save my blog posts and it went bad. See? That’s the problem with USB drives.

Between about 2010 and 2019, I only used USB drives to save my material. I have a small collection of USB drives which now are almost never touched. These drives contain old cover letters that I wrote as part of job applications, old blog posts, and even chapters of a novel I wrote about ten years ago which is badly in need of a developmental editor. It is embarrassing to admit this, because many people were using cloud storage before I was. I was the one with the little stick protruding from the side of her laptop (or, before that, from the front of her minitower).

About a year after I started my editing business, I was introduced to Dropbox. Dropbox has been a lifesaver for me. More than a terabyte of storage for whatever I want to put into it, and it’s all for me. When I first began talking to my husband about cloud storage, he asked me, “Where exactly is ‘the cloud’?”

“The cloud,” I explained, “is in Heaven. Imagine everyone owning a piece of Heaven—their very own piece, and they can put whatever files they want into their piece. That’s the best way I can explain cloud storage.”

USB drives, unlike the cloud, have very limited storage capability by comparison, and as I said before, they can fail without warning. It was only a matter of time before they became obsolete; the laptop which my husband bought this past March doesn’t even have a USB port.

Once my old USB drives all fail, I might make Christmas ornaments out of them.

If you have USB drives lying around, what do you do (or what have you done) with them?

Have you written a research manuscript you want to publish?

Have a professional editor go over it.

Manuscripts that have been scrutinized by an outside professional editor have a better chance of being accepted for publication. Let’s look at why.

A research author will spend countless hours writing their manuscript, and this can make anyone’s brain numb. After a while, the author, having gone over the same words and paragraphs over and over again, might become oblivious to things like errors in spelling and grammar. A professional editor will examine the manuscript with a fresh pair of eyes and see issues that may have slipped past the author.

Editors are also very sensitive to accessibility in a manuscript. For example, a graph of data may have a beautiful palette of colors, but these colors may be difficult to discern for a reader who has color blindness. An editor can suggest to the author that using crosshatching and dark and light shading instead is the way to go.

Authors who are writing in English when they are not accustomed to it definitely need an editor. There are languages which do not use articles, for example. An editor can fill in the “a,” “an,” and “the” where they are omitted in English by an author whose native language does not use them. (This should preferably be done with the Word macro ArticleChanger, which was programmed by Paul Beverley and saves editors countless amounts of time.) Also, the sentence structure of several non-English languages differs significantly from that of English, so whole sentences often need to be rewritten to make them flow more smoothly in English.

Let us not forget the author’s references. A professional editor will always make sure that each reference on the reference list is cited in the text (whether in Harvard, Vancouver, AMA, or any other prescribed style). Without the help of an editor, it is possible that the author may miss citing one or more of the references—which is a big problem. An editor will also make sure that the reference list is in the format required by the target journal.

What other reasons why a researcher should employ a professional editor for their manuscripts can you think of?

More upgrading for me

On June 13, I upgraded the Office suite on both my laptop and our newer one to MS Office 365. Previously, my laptop had been running Office 2019 (the standalone version) and the newer laptop didn’t have any Office software.

Performing the upgrade required a visit to the Microsoft site, a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth, a call to Microsoft tech support, and the last of my patience—but I did it. And I’m so glad I did.

The truth was that Office 2019 was no longer supported by Microsoft, which meant that no updates were available for it anymore. This included security updates, and not having those made my work dangerously vulnerable. The second (and awful) truth was that it was last fall that Office 2019 stopped being supported, but I resisted upgrading because of the cost and the fact that installing new software always makes me nervous.

I have to admit that I don’t know much about Office 365 in terms of its many features. One might wonder why I chose it instead of the standalone Office 2021 or the standalone Office 2024, the latter of which comes out later this year.

From what I read online, Office 2021 will cease to be supported by Microsoft in the fall of 2026, which is less than two and a half years from when I am writing this post. This means that if I were to drop a few hundred dollars on Office 2021 now, I will have to spend around the same amount of money on newer software just two and a half years from now.

As for Office 2024, it will be supported for several more years, but it is not going to be made available to consumers until July at the earliest (probably later than that), and since my work had been made vulnerable by Office 2019 not receiving the latest security updates, I needed to upgrade as soon as possible.

Many of the editors in my associations use Office 365, so I feel much more professional having and using it. Boy…first I upgrade to Windows 11, then Office 365. I am not a luddite anymore. (That was a joke. I was never a luddite to begin with.)

If you are using MS Office 365, what do you like the most about it? Or dislike the most?

AI: Artificial intelligence

These days, there is a lot of talk about artificial intelligence (AI).

To me, the term sounds like an oxymoron. Many decades ago, my father took a training class in the use of the personal computer. According to him, the instructor said, “The first thing to remember is that the computer is a dumb machine.” If that is true, then how can a computer show intelligence?

Just about everyone in this modern world uses AI, whether they know it or not (and whether they like it or not). For example, I have Siri on my iPhone. Siri, for those who aren’t familiar with it, is a virtual assistant which is artificially intelligent. I can ask it, “When is Bruce Springsteen’s birthday?” and it will reply in a female voice, “Bruce Springsteen was born on September twenty-third, nineteen forty-nine, and is seventy-four years old.” Or if I ask Siri a more complex question, it will show me links that potentially have the information for which I am looking. I have to admit that I love Siri.

Texting on my iPhone also exposes me to AI. As I am typing a sentence, three suggested words will appear below the text, and I can tap a word to insert it rather than typing out all of the letters. This saves me a lot of time, although sometimes it concerns me, such as when I type, “Suzelle was…” and one of the next words the app suggests is “murdered.”

For the most part, however, I don’t want much part in AI. I do not want to see a movie or TV show whose script was “created” by AI. Not necessarily because I don’t think the quality will be up to par, but because I believe humans are the only truly creative beings around. Not only that, but the human screenwriters need to eat. It is because of this that we had the writers’ strike in Hollywood last year. AI will never replace human writers. It is the same thing with music. I would not want to listen to music “composed” by AI. What would that sound like? And how would AI give a concert?

A few of my friends have Amazon Alexa in their homes. I have seen instances where Alexa will not do what you ask it to do, such as lower the volume of the music its speaker is playing. I also once heard on a TV news broadcast that there have been times when Alexa will flatly say, “No,” in response to a command. I wonder if the machines are revolting.

What is your opinion of AI?